Convictions of police in YVR case a charade


Last week, RCMP Cst. Gerry Rundel was acquitted in BC Supreme Court on charges of perjury resulting from his role in the 2007 death of Robert Dziekanski at YVR.  Tomorrow, Cst. Kwesi Millington will be in the same court for sentencing  after being convicted a little over a month ago  on the same charge based on the same fact pattern.

How is this possible you may ask.

Well it happened twice. Last summer Cst. Bill Bentley was also acquitted of perjury arising from the same fact pattern and last month Cpl. Monty Robinson was convicted.

As an aside, and I am not suggesting anything untoward, merely making an observation, but how is it that the two non-white officers are convicted but the two white officers were acquitted? (Millington is black and Robinson is native while both Bentley and Rundel are white.) Just asking.

But in some ways this is fitting considering what a dog’s breakfast this has been from the beginning. It started when RCMP spokesman Pierre Lemaitre held a morning press conference and gave fuzzy details about what happened to the media and later seemed factually inaccurate after the public surfacing of the “Pritchard’ video, a cellphone video perspective of the events of that night. And I might add, a video that was seized by Cst. Rundel in the aftermath of the incident. So, the officers knew when they gave their statements that video of the event existed. Think about that.

The RCMP, as an entity, failed utterly in Media Relations 101 out of the gate and further perpetrated that failure every step of the way. It continues today with their lack of comment on the convictions and acquittals of the members involved.

In truth, the four RCMP members attended the disturbance call to YVR International Arrivals in response to Polish traveller Dziekanski acting erratically and violently, throwing things around including a desk.

Those actions were also recorded by the tourist traveller Pritchard.

The members responded according to their training. They tried to engage verbally, which didn’t have any effect obviously because Dziekanski couldn’t speak English. We can debate until the cows come home about what happened after that and the reality is that the officers responded according to their training and the situation escalated rapidly to the point where Dziekanski grabbed a metal stapler, held it in a threatening manner and advanced toward one of the members. Cpl. Robinson gave the order to deploy a Taser (CEW) which was in the control of Cst. Millington.

Millington had only been trained on the use of a CEW for about three months. This was the first time he’d had occasion to use the non-lethal weapon.

Ironically, when he testified before the Braidwood Inquiry, for which he was ultimately charged and convicted of perjury, was the first time this young constable had ever testified before any body.

Was he confused in front of the bright lights and high-priced lawyers with an agenda? Probably, but he did his best. But perjury? It was nothing of the sort. Yet, he was still convicted in what can only be described as a bizarre decision by Mr. Justice William Ehrcke in late February.

Here’s the decision:

You tell me if you can make any sense of this yet, this is why Millington is being sentenced tomorrow.

The reality is this decision will be appealed. Sources close to the matter tell me that appeal documents will be filed this week. Given the Rundel acquittal and the trial judge’s reference to the two conviction decisions in her summation it is highly likely that an appeal will be allowed meaning that tomorrow’s process will be little more than a charade. Which frankly, is an apt description of the Crown’s attempt  to get some scalps for the whole Dziekanski mess.

Those officers did their job according to the training they had. Period. That Dziekanski died as a result is tragic. But nothing in any of this is criminal on behalf the RCMP members involved.


Leo Knight


Read Full Article


  1. For once I can agree with you about something; that is the corruption of the BC Courts, both provincial and federal. What you are seing is indeed fudging the law. Blenderizing it, is a good description. I have little doubt that the convictions will be overturned, as they are intended to be.

    I saw the video. I recognized those “officers” intent the instant I saw them go in. I hold all four guilty of manslaughter. Period.

    If in fact the Pole had been wielding a stapler, all four of the cops would have been dead instantly. Everyone knows there is no defense against a stapler. But, I saw Mr.D’s hands w/o stapler throughout the incident.

    It is a pity these cops’ “training” didn’t include a drop of common sense or human decency. They FAILED to communicate with the “suspect” (in truth, the ‘victim’), and resorted, 4 armed and assault trained, to 1 lost, alone and frustrated immigrant whose mother had been RE-DIRECTED away from her expected son’s arrival. I don’t recall your acknowledgement of just how long this man had been illegally held in confinement by the airport, nor the complete lack of support he experienced at YVR.

    Now, if just ONE of those four quaking cowards who ATTACKED Mr. D had the common sense and decency to merely approach, perhaps lay a friendly hand on his shoulder for re-assurance, and talk to this man kindly and supportively via ANY MEANS POSSIBLE, they would not have coommitted this criminal act.

    It is my misfortune to commonly take it upon myself to talk to lost and disoriented foreigners. I have ALWAYS been able to discern the best course of action for these people to take. I have nothing to rely upon but common sense and decency. Apparently that is a quality of discernment that can’t be trained into the recruits selected by the RCMP.

    Again, based on what I saw on the video tape, The RCMP entered Mr.D’s presence with a deliberate and unmasked intention to assault and falesly arrest an innocent man who had been mistreated by every Canadian he had contact with, and four convictioins for manslaughter would only be a good start for justice, actual Canadian justice, for Mr. D, who lawfully entered this country.

    • You haven’t a clue what you’re talking about. But you are entitled to your misguided opinion.

      Leo Knight @primetimecrime

      Sent from my iPhone. I apologize for any typos.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here