| |
|
|
(Published in the Chilliwack Times week of May 19, 2008) |
|
|
|
We Won't Get Fooled Again - Yeah, Right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may have noticed the full-page ad that showed up in several B.C. newspapers last week featuring a woman with a strip of tape across her mouth and the headline, "Gordon Campbell wants you to just shut up." |
|
|
|
The ad is part of a campaign to oppose Bill 42, a piece of legislation that would place strict limits on how much advertising dollars third parties may spend during the five months leading up to a provincial election. |
|
|
|
Specifically, the law would restrict individuals or groups from spending more than $3,000 in a particular riding and a maximum of $150,000 across the province. This may sound like a lot but in reality, wouldn't go too far in purchasing big market media space and time. (If you bought a full-page newspaper ad, it could run you about $15,000 or more. A 30-second commercial on prime-time television is about the same cost.) |
|
|
|
In opposition, Campbell was a fierce critic of these so-called "gag laws" but he seems quite enthusiastic about limiting pre-election debate this time round. No doubt the legislation is specifically aimed at labour unions who have spent a king's ransom in advertising dollars attacking the government and would surely be planning a pricey, anti-Campbell campaign in the months leading up to the next election. |
|
|
|
Critics of the legislation are rightly outraged that they will be all but silenced in the near future. There is a similar law at the federal level but it only restricts spending during the actual campaign. |
|
|
|
The B.C. legislation would essentially stifle critics for almost half a year prior to voting day. |
|
|
|
The end result of these laws is that politicians and journalists alone get to define and dominate the dialogue during a campaign. This worked particularly well for the federal Liberals, who had near unanimous support from every major media outlet in the country for almost a decade. In three consecutive elections journalists and commentators would trip over themselves praising Jean Chretien's government and no one else had a realistic opportunity to sing a different tune. |
|
Ultimately, gag laws are about silencing voices and controlling the debate during an election. That the government of B.C. has decided it wants to do so for a full five months is frightening. Gordon Campbell's government has indicated it is prepared to invoke closure to ensure Bill 42 becomes law within a month. With the next election a full year away, as of mid-December it will be very difficult to purchase advertising for the purposes of criticizing the government or its policies. |
|
Regardless of whether one supports or opposes this government, they should be very concerned about a gag law of this magnitude. It constitutes a back-door strategy to trample free expression and it insults the public's intelligence by insinuating that a series of nasty ads by a special interest group will determine how they vote. For Gordon Campbell to bring in a law five times more restrictive than the one he opposed when the NDP were in power is shameful. |
|
It reminds me of the line in a song by The Who, "meet the new boss -- same as the old boss." |
|
John Martin is a Criminologist at the University College of the Fraser Valley and can be contacted at John.Martin@ucfv.ca |
|